• Isadora
  • Get it
  • Forum
  • Help
  • ADD-ONS
  • Newsletter
  • Impressum
  • Dsgvo
  • Impressum
Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Tags
    • Register
    • Login

    Gpu cpu actors

    Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
    3
    9
    2.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • camilozkC
      camilozk
      last edited by

      yup!

      I am trying to update my projects in order to have the most GPU actors in use possible. Depending on what is needed, it is nevertheless not possible yet to have 100% GPU running projects, so my question is, how much sense has to attempt to do this, if in the patches "gpu-cpu converters" have to be applied? (see image attached)
      thanks!!

      254360-untitled-1.jpg

      i5 M520 @ 2.40GHz / 4Gb Ram / Win 7 - izzy 2.2.2
      i7 7700HQ @ 2.8GHz / 16Gb Ram / Win 10 - izzy 2.6.1 // GeForce GTX 1060

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DusXD
        DusX Tech Staff
        last edited by

        well, if you really want to use 'wave' and you are using GPU based fx after this then this is the best option.

        If you are not using more GPU effects after, I would suggest running it out as vid CPU. (reducing every possible conversion will help)
        Another trick I sometimes do is branch the GPU video, so I have the GPU pipeline and a CPU pipeline (generally I reduce its resolution to 1/2 or 1/4)
        Play with each as needed and mix again at a later point. This helps me to reduce conversions, and the scaling during the conversion to CPU will save a lot of processing power.
        Although, you can't always do this.

        Troikatronix Technical Support

        • New Support Ticket Link: https://support.troikatronix.com/support/tickets/new
        • Isadora Add-ons: https://troikatronix.com/add-ons/
        • My Add-ons: https://troikatronix.com/add-ons/?u=dusx

        Running: Win 11 64bit, i7, M.2 PCIe SSD's, 32gb DDR4, nVidia GTX 4070 | located in Ontario Canada.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • markM
          mark
          last edited by

          @camilozk,

          Just to be clear: the old "Pete's Plugins" FreeFrame actors are all CPU based, and unless Pete Warden decides to update them, they'll never be GPU. If you use those plugins, there's unfortunately not another solution.
          Best Wishes,
          Mark

          Media Artist & Creator of Isadora
          Macintosh SE-30, 32 Mb RAM, MacOS 7.6, Dual Floppy Drives

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • camilozkC
            camilozk
            last edited by

            loud and clear guys. thank you very much

            Allow me anyway to put a real example to analyze it. The example is invented but it could perfectly be the case; In the configuration that appears in the image attached, where everything is GPU based except for "wave", it makes more sense to convert to CPU before and after "wave" rather than having the whole proyect CPU based?

            i5 M520 @ 2.40GHz / 4Gb Ram / Win 7 - izzy 2.2.2
            i7 7700HQ @ 2.8GHz / 16Gb Ram / Win 10 - izzy 2.6.1 // GeForce GTX 1060

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • camilozkC
              camilozk
              last edited by

              attached now f95eaa-untitled-1.jpg

              i5 M520 @ 2.40GHz / 4Gb Ram / Win 7 - izzy 2.2.2
              i7 7700HQ @ 2.8GHz / 16Gb Ram / Win 10 - izzy 2.6.1 // GeForce GTX 1060

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DusXD
                DusX Tech Staff
                last edited by

                I would say that the approach makes sense in the case you have shown.

                Troikatronix Technical Support

                • New Support Ticket Link: https://support.troikatronix.com/support/tickets/new
                • Isadora Add-ons: https://troikatronix.com/add-ons/
                • My Add-ons: https://troikatronix.com/add-ons/?u=dusx

                Running: Win 11 64bit, i7, M.2 PCIe SSD's, 32gb DDR4, nVidia GTX 4070 | located in Ontario Canada.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • camilozkC
                  camilozk
                  last edited by

                  cool. thanks dusx!

                  i5 M520 @ 2.40GHz / 4Gb Ram / Win 7 - izzy 2.2.2
                  i7 7700HQ @ 2.8GHz / 16Gb Ram / Win 10 - izzy 2.6.1 // GeForce GTX 1060

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • markM
                    mark
                    last edited by

                    Dear @camilozk,

                    In the case you cite, that's the best approach. However, keep this in mind: converting from CPU to GPU is fast, but the other way around (GPU to CPU) is slow and will reduce performance. Avoid this conversion if at all possible.

                    Best Wishes,
                    Mark

                    Media Artist & Creator of Isadora
                    Macintosh SE-30, 32 Mb RAM, MacOS 7.6, Dual Floppy Drives

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • camilozkC
                      camilozk
                      last edited by

                      I must then hope that the slowness of the GPU to CPU converting is compensated by the efficiency of using mostly GPU based actors, because in most of my set ups I am running several Pete´s Plugins...

                      thanks!

                      i5 M520 @ 2.40GHz / 4Gb Ram / Win 7 - izzy 2.2.2
                      i7 7700HQ @ 2.8GHz / 16Gb Ram / Win 10 - izzy 2.6.1 // GeForce GTX 1060

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post